User talk:Karl Stas

This user may have left Wikipedia. Karl Stas has not edited Wikipedia since April 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome

Hello there Karl, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. BTW, nice work on Paul Van Zeeland - I formated the date section to conform to our maual of style. Cheers! --maveric149

Hi Karl! Welcome to wiki! Just to let you know that I found a couple of the authors you've written on (Lipius, Campellena) listed in Library of Sir Thomas Browne. I'm always interested in making contact with Euro scholars especially when fields of interest meet. Sir T.B. graduated from Leyden 1637. Norwich in 17th c. shared in trade, culture,migration even dialect with the Low Countries . I've noticed there are several contemporary Flemish authors in Catalogue. May i link titles to Library ? Always good to see serious work from a Euro scholar Norwikian 15:39, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm not actually a scholar, I'm more of a dilettante. Feel free to make links. KS

I see where you did the excellent article on Paul-Henri Spaak. I came across Suzanne Spaak, the wife of Paul-Henri Spaak's brother, Claude Spaak. I had a hard time finding much on her background so I did the best biography I could. However, because you live in Belgium I thought you might have library and other sources to search for better information. It would be nice to try to get her full maiden name, plus place and date of birth etc. NightCrawler 16:31, 9 Nov 2003 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. KS

Hi Karl,

any article that is to be added to Wikipedia:Featured articles has to undergo approval at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates first. This does not appear to be the case for Ignatius of Loyola, so I removed it from the list again.--Eloquence * 09:38, Apr 12, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your excellent (italicizing) work on the "List of Belgians". --Edcolins 18:51, Jul 4, 2004 (UTC)

Hello Karl,

Why have you changed, in List of comic creators, the link of Morris to Maurice de Bévère, while this latter is redirected to Morris (comics) ? Shouldn't we talk about this guy, with always the same name ? Morris is far more familiar to me than Maurice de Bévère, and i have read a couple of Lucky Luke ! Lvr 10:42, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

You're right, I have made a direct link to Morris (comics) now. -- KS

I did the same for Lucky Luke. Lvr 14:57, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Hi Karl, thanks for changing the date of death, they have changed it 3 times so far on the television and I was just about to amend it again.Scraggy4 17:33, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)

See Talk:Henri Cartier-Bresson - Karl Stas 22:25, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Unverified images

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

Image:Lassus.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{PD-self}} if you wish to release your own work to the public domain, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. Peter O. (Talk, automation script) 21:28, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Image:MonaLisaCoffeeCup.jpg

Could you please also clarify the source/copyright status of Image:MonaLisaCoffeeCup.jpg? Thanks, nyenyec ☎ 17:01, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Giaches de Wert

Hello, good work on Giaches de Wert, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. From what websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Giaches de Wert? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET if you wish to review some of the different citation methods. Thanks! Lupin|talk|popups 03:29, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

queen of singers

Hello. I am the person who put in the "queen of singers," the comment you reverted. Fine, I won't change it back, but I am bilingual in English and Italian and I assure you that the term "voce regina" can indeed be read as an insulting pun--roughly in the modern sense of "queen" especially when applied to a castrato. I might have written "queen of voices" and not "queen of singers", in which case it is the same sort of metonomy as calling Frank Sinatra "the voice". Jeffmatt 18:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "voce regina" can be translated as "queen of voices" (not "queen of singers"). I'm not sure if this is intended as a pun, though. Since "voce" is female, the epithet has to be female as well. Karl Stas 11:17, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to a castrato as "queen of voices" is probably intentional since Farinelli was commonly called in his lifetime, "singer to the kings". Calling a castrato a "queen of voices" is clearly an attempt to be clever and there are grammatical ways to get around the problem if one chooses to do so. In any event, I did say "read as" (meaning "interpreted"), not "translated", in which case "queen of singers" and "queen of voices" mean pretty much the same thing. Jeffmatt 07:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Early Netherlandish painting

I would suggest a merge between that article, Flemish School, and Flemish painting. The most difficult could be to reconcile points of view about what was Flemish or not in those times. Give me your advice if you please. --DLL 17:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say you are wrong, Karl. Go on as you feel it. --DLL 21:00, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of this Wikipedia talk:Censorship ?

For myself, I would like to say that the method is not innocent. The subject is truly important : there is one talk page and twoscore people discussing auto censorship for one million (counting non active users). Will you give your advice ? --DLL 20:09, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saints Wikiproject

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints.

You are invited to participate in Saints WikiProject, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about saints. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.

Thanks! --evrik 19:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2005 Belgian urban violence

Hi, I've nominated 2005 Belgian urban violence for deletion : Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Belgian urban violence (second nomination). I thought you might be interested. --LucVerhelst 21:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Belgians

Hi, you may wish to participate to this debate: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Belgians. Cheers. --Edcolins 07:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Belgium

Dag Karl,

ik heb momenteel het initiatief genomen voor het nieuwe WikiProject Belgium, neem eens een kijkje en als je geïnteresseerd bent aarzel dan niet om je bij de deelnemers te zetten! Aangezien je degene bent die het artikel over Paul-Henri Spaak is begonnen, denk ik dat dit project op je lijf geschreven is! Natuurlijk zonder verplichtingen...

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 01:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Endorphin

The Endorphin article received heavy editing today by unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 07:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lily Pons.jpg

Do you have information on source for Image:Lily Pons.jpg? If so, please add it. Thanks, -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Antoine_Wiertz_La_Belle_Rosine.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Antoine_Wiertz_La_Belle_Rosine.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 11:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Marcel Duchamp Mona Lisa LHOOQ.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Marcel Duchamp Mona Lisa LHOOQ.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BJ^Talk 20:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've crossed the t and dotted the i, but fill in the details when you get a chance.--Father Goose (talk) 06:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force

I am looking for help improving the dermatology content on wikipedia. Would you be willing to help, or do you have any friends interested in derm that would be interested in helping? Kilbad (talk) 14:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Antoine Wiertz La Belle Rosine.jpg

File:Antoine Wiertz La Belle Rosine.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Antoine Wiertz Two Young Girls or the Beautiful Rosine.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Antoine Wiertz Two Young Girls or the Beautiful Rosine.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Karl Stas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

René Stockman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gundula Janowitz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Victorine meurent.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Victorine meurent.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philippe de Champaigne ex voto.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Philippe de Champaigne ex voto.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:02, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Source

It would be appreciated if you could clarify where File:Munch The Scream lithography.gif was obtained from? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Marcel Duchamp Mona Lisa LHOOQ.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Marcel Duchamp Mona Lisa LHOOQ.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]