Jump to content

Talk:Oxford

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 5, 2008Peer reviewReviewed

The High

[edit]

There's an unreffed claim that High Street is normally referred to as 'The High'. While this was common usage within the University in times past, it's rarely employed today - I don't think I've ever heard an actual Oxford resident use it in the 35 years I've been living there. It has connotations of Bertie Wooster and Brideshead Revisited. If the claim is going to stay in the article it needs a specific ref. Ef80 (talk) 09:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's easy enough to find references showing it has been referred to as The High for a considerable time such as this from 1898 and this from 1988, but referencing whether that's still the case now, or conversely that the term has since fallen out of use, would be much harder. WaggersTALK 10:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly, when I was a graduate student in the late 70s the term was already seen as archaic and was little used even in the University. I suspect it's just obsolete public school / undergraduate slang, but as you say, finding good refs to support this is difficult. --Ef80 (talk) 10:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"The High" is still fairly commonly used within the University, and survives in names such as "Honey's Of The High". Other similar names are definitely disappearing: "The Broad" is getting rare, and "The Turl" is almost unheard of these days. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 12:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden Figures - Jesus College

[edit]

Just dropping a note in case any page-watchers feel like creating an article for one of these women that Jesus College is celebrating later in the year: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Women_in_Red#Women_connected_to_Jesus_College,_Oxford Lajmmoore (talk) 21:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Panorama Suspiciously Like Image Generated Art

[edit]

Hi, I was trying to read about Oxford and started looking through the images and noticed that the panorama looks suspiciously like an image generation algorithm. The walls and tiles of buildings look like they're made of playdough or melting. Most of the grass and bushes have a "smeared" quality. Portions of the image do not appear to color match with other portions of the image, and buildings appear to have been sloppily overlaid on each other. The entire image looks "cartoonish" or like it was drawn with oil paint.

I believe the motivation is like the same as much of the rest of the world wide web, easy achievements, notoriety, and praise, without actually visiting locations.

The picture in question is:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b8/1_oxford_aerial_panorama_2016.jpg

Araesmojo (talk) 03:12, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I can see what look like compression artefacts the image appears to me, based on having lived and worked in Oxford for 40 years, to be entirely genuine. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 08:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not AI-generated, it's 8 years old. Instead, it's a stitched image, and very badly stitched one at that. It's such bad quality I am removing it from the article. Of course if other's put it back in then we can discuss further here. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]