Talk:Le Figaro
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Le Figaro article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image
[edit]What do you think if i put this picture to illustrate this article, is it too humourious ? Chmouel 18:26, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
the figaro Motto is in french "Sans la liberté de blâmer, il n'est point d'éloge flatteur" please can somebody translate this http://www.lefigaro.fr/perm/une_journal.html --83.192.1.86 15:45, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Political stance
[edit]Is this newspaper really more conservative than the "Le Monde" is left wing? The tone of the two articles is quite different. Whereas it is downplayed in one, it is pointedly marked out in the other. Should we harmonise this?
- Yes, it is. Read what Le Figaro's owner said. David.Monniaux 12:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- On the (admittedly few) occasions I have read it, it has come across as Anglophobic and Americaphobic... As a Brit, I would say it's barely less xenophobic than the Daily Mail or The Sun (and the views of these papers are something of a national joke here in the UK!). It is certainly about as conservative as mainstream France gets, and definitely low-brow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.230.167 (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Its Political stance is center-right and right-wing. Le Figaro is also libéral (European sense) that is to say inspired of Montesquieu, Tocqueville or Raymond Aron. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.44.104.39 (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- On the (admittedly few) occasions I have read it, it has come across as Anglophobic and Americaphobic... As a Brit, I would say it's barely less xenophobic than the Daily Mail or The Sun (and the views of these papers are something of a national joke here in the UK!). It is certainly about as conservative as mainstream France gets, and definitely low-brow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.230.167 (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Occupation
[edit]Did Figaro continue to publish during the Occupation? If so, how did it survive when the other collaborationist papers were shut down after the Liberation? This should be mentioned in the article. Intelligent Mr Toad 18:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Figaro don't continue to publish (on 11 novembre 1942). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.44.104.39 (talk) 12:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Le Figaro logo.svg
[edit]Image:Le Figaro logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
about the bronze heads poll hold by Le Figaro
[edit]In future, if the poll result is not as they expected, they will announce it is elected by Chinese. French can choose to accept what they want, they just don't have a standard on universal value. LOL...--76.254.141.249 (talk) 04:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Mideast conflict
[edit]It would be interesting if we could gather information on Le Figaro's editorial policies on the Mideast conflict, which is a controversial topic in contemporary journalism. ADM (talk) 09:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Ownership
[edit]The last part of the lead paragraph reads: Template:Quote
This article is from 2006, but says that it's owned by Socpresse, which is also owned by Dassault Group in any case. Should the sentence be changed, then, or does someone have a reference which shows that it is Le Figaro Group that owns the paper?
Publication schedule ?
[edit]Competing newspaper Le Monde's print edition comes out around lunchtime, while the date on the masthead is the following day's (e.g. the issue released at midday on 15 March shows 16 March on the masthead), is what I read in Le Monde#Publication schedule and in reuters, 14 May 2014. How is that with Le Figaro? --Corriebertus (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Le Figaro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140816014141/http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round6/methods/ESS6_media_landscape_media_claims_ed_02_0.pdf to http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round6/methods/ESS6_media_landscape_media_claims_ed_02_0.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Le Figaro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060703212939/http://www1.lexpress.fr/info/societe/dossier/faitdiv/dossier.asp?ida=429007 to http://www.lexpress.fr/info/societe/dossier/faitdiv/dossier.asp?ida=429007
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Right or centre-right ?
[edit]In the article there are several sources saying the paper is right-wing, including the director of Le Figaro himself. However on the side-bar there are several sources for "centre-right". It seems a clarification is needed. Poulets777 (talk) 16:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class France articles
- High-importance France articles
- Paris task force articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- C-Class Newspapers articles
- High-importance Newspapers articles
- C-Class Journalism articles
- Top-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- C-Class Media articles
- High-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles